Vilsack endorsing Clinton

All those people in Agriculture in Iowa:  Supposedly Fox News said that the Hillary/Obama/Vilsack machine is doing a great job in Iowa.  Better get the word out about Vilsack’s wife taking a donation from HSUS and the fact that Christie Vilsack

1. Had about $750,000 of help from HSUS in her 2012 congressional run.

2. Christie Vilsack is now employed by USAID under her husband.

3. That Vilsack hires animal rights extremist to work in the USDA.   Animal Rights groups are against animals for food or fiber in direct contradiction to the reason why we have the USDA.

Vilsack is back on the campaign trail for the O regime.

Here’s the latest news release :http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2013/11/13/vilsack-iowa-not-impossible-for-christie-or-clinton

Advertisements
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Children as young as Five Years Old! Lobbyist

Lobbying flyer

Image | Posted on by | Leave a comment

Why are Citizens Broke?

When a President takes office he “nominates” people to be placed in key positions and usually with the same ideology of the President. Those Key Positions include all Federal Agencies .  Obama placed many Key people in Federal Agencies while Congress was in “recess” which avoided Congressional approval.  One such person ran the EEOC who was chair of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).

While it is true that the President and the Federal Agencies are not legally allowed to write legislation, they are allowed to write Regulation. Regulation and Legislation are one and the same.  They are both laws that citizens must abide by or be fined/jailed.  Browse through Regulations.gov

regulations.govSept 15, 2014

The above picture is how many regulations have been written in the past 90 days and just the past 90 days. For anyone to believe that 6,343 new Regulations are needed to enforce licensing laws is outrageous.

The law states that Regulations must follow the intent of Congress when Congress wrote the bill that the Regulations are being drawn up for. However, this One law has not been followed and is actively promoted by the Obama regime to be violated.  More Bills equals more regulations equals less freedom and LESS INCOME FOR CITIZENS!

These regulations prohibit citizens from forming small businesses, engaging in commerce, and providing an income for their families. The regulations are restrictive and do not have to issue permits to anyone that they do not want to issue to.  The stronghold on a permit gives the government the right to decide who does or does not do business to make a living.

By browsing the website regulations.gov, you will find a new regulation for almost any industry. A regulation is a way for the government to “tax” anyone in that profession.

To add insult to injury, you may comment on the regulation being proposed but your comments are just that, comments. They do not have to nor will they take the comments into consideration.  Almost every regulation proposed is placed into regulation.

Write to your Representatives/Senators and make them assert the law.

Dear Representative/Senator:

Federal Agencies have abused their power and provided an avenue to prohibit free enterprise in the United States.

Enforce the law that prohibits Federal Agencies from  writing regulations that are in contrast to the Intent of Congress.

We need more free enterprise, not more licensing/taxing of the poor!

Thank you

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

About 535 Lawyers

Congress, at times, amazes me. From what I’ve been told, Congress has the power to force the President to do the job he was elected to do and prevent him from overstepping his bounds.  Congress is made up of about 535 Lawyers who claim they are “top dog” in the “know it all” department.  So what’s all the hype about?

Reading over the statements made by Representatives and Senators, my jaw drops and the frontal lobe of my brain starts working overtime. My left brain said to the right “I thought we elected Congress to take care of our National Problems.”

  • Rule of law in America depends on that our President doesn’t have the power to do this,” said Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah). “He certainly has no business telling us he’s going to do it by executive fiat after the election. But the fact that he’s done that should hasten us to vote on it now.”
  • In the Senate, I was proud to introduce legislation to put into law to make it unequivocal that the president prospectively has no authority to grant amnesty,” Cruz said
  • Rep. John Carter (R-Texas) said. “Let’s get real: Follow the law, Mr. President, you follow the law, we’ll be happy.”
  • President Obama feels he is “above the law” and has made a “habit” of violating the Constitution and U.S. law, Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., charged in a radio interview Sunday
  • Washington Republicans on Sunday restated their argument that President Obama has violated the Constitution
  • The president knows this is wrong,” said Lee
  • The Supreme Court dealt a blow to the powers of the presidency Thursday, ruling decisively that President Obama violated the Constitution
  • GOP Lawmakers: Prisoner Exchange Violated Law, by failing to provide congress 30 days notice before transferring any terrorist from the U.S. detention facility in Cuba
  • WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama violated the Constitution when he bypassed the Senate last year to appoint three members of the National Labor Relations

And on and on and on.

And then we have the bloggers repeatedly announcing, with references, incidents of treason, bribery etc. etc. of President Obama which are all offenses for impeachment.

So, I’ve ask my Representative and Senators for the reason they are standing around bitchin’ about what the President is doing when they have the power to stop it!

Perhaps our next letter to our elected Officials should read…

Dear Representative/Senator:

I’ve noticed in the news that you and/or your colleagues have made repeated statements that President Obama has violated law.

In recent months, I received a ticket for not wearing my seat belt in which I have been put through the ringer. If not wearing a seat belt is enough to be prosecuted for, why can’t we prosecute a President who has committed Treason?  Obviously, law enforcement is a little on the board side so perhaps we should give them something of interest to work on rather than harassing innocent citizens who do no harm to others.

Isn’t treason and bribery a much worse case than not wearing a seat belt? Or, do you promote funding terrorists also?

I’ll be looking forward to your quick response.

Thank you,

Kimberly Kraemer

P.S. I don’t care if you are Democrat or Republic or Tea Party. Treason and Bribery have no political preference.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

ISIS-ISIL Sanctions?

One could generally call me a “disbeliever” when President (of some unknown country) Obama struck out in his September 10, 2014 against “ISIS”.  Some people rant and rave that they don’t like Obama for some unknown reason without specifics.  I’m the fair type of person and like documentation with an objection.  Could someone explain this to me that is more familiar with the organizations in the Middle East?

In Obama’s Executive Order 13606 (Paperwork at end of this article-scroll down to see), the title leads one to believe that Obama is issuing Sanctions against the Governments of Iran and Syria.  However, reading through the Order 13606, I came across Section 10: “The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to determine that circumstances no longer warrant the blocking of the property and interests in property of a person listed in the Annex to this order and to take necessary action to give effect to that determination.”

So, I check the Annex to see WHO is no longer being blocked from property and interests in property, which include land, stocks, and bank accounts.

The Annex lists:

1. Ali MAMLUK [director of the Syrian General Intelligence Directorate, born 1947]
Entities:
1. Syrian General Intelligence Directorate
2. Syriatel
3. Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
4. Iranian Ministry of Intelligence and Security
5. Law Enforcement Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran
6. Datak Telecom

Now, to me, this sounds like a list of terrorist.  So, a little further checking I came across this article  concerning the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps:

“Soleimani, 57, is the former commander of Quds Force, the special-force division of the notorious Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and is described as the most powerful actor in the Middle East cauldron.He is still believed to control the Quds Force, responsible for Iran’s extraterritorial activity in the region, and answers only to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei…..It is said that Soleimani’s intervention in Syria, where he provided counsel, weapons and raised militia units to join the morale-weakened Syrian army, is directly responsible for keeping Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad in power. The US has listed him as a terrorist, and Australia has made it a criminal offence for anyone to make assets available to him.”

“Soleimani, who in his early years as a soldier fought both Iraqis and Kurds, has managed to negotiate a supply route from Iran across northern Iraq, through Kurdish lands, to Syria.  From there, he has given Iran has access to Lebanon and Hezbollah, which the CSIS describes as Iran’s “closest non-state ally”.  The CSIS says Soleimani’s aim in to train and build a Shia insurgency across the region. That means will mean increasing military support to the Assad regime, partly because Iran needs continued access to Hezbollah — a terrorist and criminal organisation that relies on Iran, just as Iran relies on it for money laundering, racketeering, drug trafficking and projecting itself by proxy in the region.”

And this about Syriatel:

“The European Union imposed sanctions on Syria’s main mobile phone operator Syriatel

And if you want to be really confused, check this out on Datak Telecom.  The report, located here,  thinks that there are sanctions against Datak Telecom.  Here’s an excerpt:

“The executive order that Obama signed on Sunday freezes U.S. assets linked to those aiding satellite, computer and phone network monitoring in Syria as well as Iran, where Washington believes authorities are targeting opposition members. It cites the Syrian General Intelligence Directorate, the Syrian cell phone company Syriatel, Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Iran’s Law Enforcement Forces and the Iranian Internet provider Datak Telecom,….”

Another fun filled fact ISIS and ISIL is the same group but ISIL covers more territory.  The “L” stands for Levant “the town of Levant just outside of Bangor was named for the Middle Eastern region back in 1813.”

1813.”  President Executive Order 13606 with Annex pg 1President Executive Order 13606 with Annex pg 2President Executive Order 13606 with Annex pg 3President Executive Order 13606 with Annex pg 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Our Contract

Our Constitution was written as a form of a contract between ourselves.  We are the government.  It is ours to do as we please because it is ours.  Government is the result of our Constitution between ourselves, the people of the United States.

For every Bill, every piece of legislation, every local ordinance, it is another amendment to our Contract between ourselves.  When we try to enforce so many laws because he wants this and I want that and she wants something else, we are not only asking for everyone to abide by our own idea of right and wrong, we are asking for a larger police force to enforce those laws.

When we start taking property through legislation that belongs to others simply because we do not believe that person “deserves” or “is treating that property” correctly, we are imposing our moral beliefs upon others.

Law is a philosophy where people have the authority to protect what is theirs.  It is not our right to protect another’s property from themselves.  The previous sentence is in contradiction to the meaning of law.

When we allow groups of people, based on moral belief, to introduce legislation written to influence moral belief upon the entire country, we are legislating Religion.

At the first sight of most pieces of legislation, they seem like innocent and good ideas.  One of the first questions to ask when reading legislation is “How does this help me protect the property I own?” and the bigger question for all concerned “How does this protect the United States?”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Helping Hands Reform Act

The Helping Hands Reform Act

This act is an effort to provide economic help to individuals who have experienced economic hardship with the benefit of an Internal Revenue Service deduction for those who contribute to the individuals benefit.

Definitions

(1)”Charitable Act” means any donation, monetary, commodity, or labor, to an individual person or family, not a corporation, who has experienced an economic hardship

(2) “Tax Deductible” means deductible expense by any person, not a corporation or non-profit organization, off an Internal Revenue Service line item for charitable giving

(3) “Hardship” means any event which caused a loss of 30% or more of an individual’s income or property.

Sec. 1

(A)  Any person, not a corporation or non-profit organization, who performs a charitable act for an individual who has experienced an economic hardship shall:

(1) Provide a written receipt signed by both parties with social security numbers and dated to document the transaction

(2) Provide two documents justifying the transaction was performed for an individual who has experienced a recent hardship.  Those documents which qualify would be:

(a) a newspaper article
(b) a police report
(c) declaration of a national or state emergency in which the individual resides
(d) a document showing loss of employment and is not receiving unemployment compensation
(e) a tax return showing at or under the poverty level declared by the United States
(f) document proving the individual lost 30% or more of their possessions or income through a tragic event.

(B) With documentation listed in Sec. (A)(2)(a-f), an individual or family, may use as a tax deduction off of Internal Revenue Service yearly personal filing in the charitable giving line item of their IRS tax form.

(C) Deductions under this section may not be used on a personal tax filing and again as an organized non-profit deduction.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment